<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>审稿 &#8211; 晨阳博客</title>
	<atom:link href="https://zhangchenyang.cn/category/lw/sg/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://zhangchenyang.cn</link>
	<description>欢迎来到张晨阳的博客</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2019 01:24:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>zh-Hans</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>[转]英文论文审稿意见汇总</title>
		<link>https://zhangchenyang.cn/87.html</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[晨阳]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2019 01:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[审稿]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[转载]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zhangchenyang.cn/?p=87</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[作为审稿人，有时候一些审稿意见不知道怎么写，下面是一些常见的审稿意见。 1、目标和结果不清晰。&#038;nb&#8230; <a href="https://zhangchenyang.cn/87.html" class="more-link read-more" rel="bookmark">继续阅读 <span class="screen-reader-text">[转]英文论文审稿意见汇总</span><i class="fa fa-arrow-right"></i></a>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>作为审稿人，有时候一些审稿意见不知道怎么写，下面是一些常见的审稿意见。</p>



<p>1、目标和结果不清晰。<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;  It is noted that your manuscript needs careful editing by someone with  expertise in technical English editing paying particular attention to  English grammar, spelling, and sentence structure so that the goals and  results of the study are clear to the reader.</p>



<p>2、未解释研究方法或解释不充分。<br>◆ In general, there is a lack of explanation of replicates and statistical me<br>thods used in the study. <br>◆ Furthermore, an explanation of why the authors did these various experiments <br>should be provided. </p>



<p>3、对于研究设计的rationale:<br>&nbsp;&nbsp; Also, there are few explanations of the rationale for the study design. </p>



<p>4、夸张地陈述结论/夸大成果/不严谨：<br>&nbsp;&nbsp; The conclusions are overstated.&nbsp; For example, the study did not show if the side effects from initial copper burst can be avoid with the polymer formulation.</p>



<p>5、对hypothesis的清晰界定：<br>&nbsp;&nbsp; A hypothesis needs to be presented。</p>



<p>6、对某个概念或工具使用的rationale/定义概念：<br>&nbsp;&nbsp; What was the rationale for the film/SBF volume ratio?</p>



<p>7、对研究问题的定义：<br>&nbsp;&nbsp; Try to set the problem discussed in this paper in more clear, write one section to define the problem</p>



<p>8、如何凸现原创性以及如何充分地写literature review: <br>&nbsp;&nbsp; The&nbsp; topic&nbsp; is&nbsp; novel&nbsp; but&nbsp; the&nbsp; application&nbsp; proposed&nbsp; is&nbsp; not&nbsp; so&nbsp; novel.</p>



<p><br>9、对claim,如A＞B的证明，verification: <br>&nbsp;&nbsp;
 There is no experimental comparison of the algorithm with previously 
known work, so it is impossible to judge whether the algorithm is an 
improvement on previous work.</p>



<p>10、严谨度问题：<br>&nbsp;&nbsp; MNQ is easier than the primitive PNQS, how to prove that. </p>



<p>11、格式（重视程度）：<br>◆
 In addition, the list of references is not in our style. It is close 
but not completely correct. I have attached a pdf file with 
&#8220;Instructions for Authors&#8221; which shows examples. <br>◆ Before submitting
 a revision be sure that your material is properly prepared and 
formatted.&nbsp; If you are unsure, please consult the formatting nstructions
 to authors that are given under the &#8220;Instructions and Forms&#8221; button in 
he upper right-hand corner of the screen.</p>



<p>12、语言问题（出现最多的问题）：<br>有关语言的审稿人意见：<br>◆  It is noted that your manuscript needs careful editing by someone with  expertise in technical English editing paying particular attention to  English grammar, spelling, and sentence structure so that the goals and  results of the study are clear to the reader. <br>◆ The authors must  have their work reviewed by a proper translation/reviewing service  before submission; only then can a proper review be performed. Most  sentences contain grammatical and/or spelling mistakes or are not  complete sentences.<br>◆ As presented, the writing is not acceptable for the journal.&nbsp; There are pro<br>blems with sentence structure, verb tense, and clause construction. <br>◆ The English of your manuscript must be improved before resubmission. We str<br>ongly suggest that you obtain assistance from a colleague who is well-versed in English or whose native language is English.<br>◆ Please have someone competent in the English language and the subject matter of your paper go over the paper and correct it. ?<br>◆ the quality of English needs improving.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
